Overview of hardware vulnerabilities of embedded systems on the example of Rowhammer.

Keywords: embedded system vulnerabilities, rowhammer, dram memory, x86 architecture.

Abstract

The article examines the vulnerabilities of embedded systems on the example of Rowhammer. The essence of the vulnerability and ways to use it to commit illegal acts are explained. Features of this vulnerability on devices with x86 architecture are also described and several possible attack methods are considered.

References

Enhancing Critical Infrastructure Protection with Innovative SECurity Framework (CIPSEC). H2020 European Project. Available online: www.cipsec.eu (accessed on 28 March 2017).

Challener, D.; Yoder, K.; Catherman, R.; Safford, D.; Van Doorn, L. A Practical Guide to Trusted Computing; IBM Press: Indianapolis, IN, USA, 2007.

Trusted Computing Group. TCG TPM Specification Version 2.0; Trusted Computing Group: Beaverton, OR, USA, 2014.

ARM. ARMTrustZone. Available online: https://www.arm.com/products/security-on-arm/trustzone (accessed on 1 April 2017).

Kim, Y.R.; Daly, J.; Kim, C.; Fallin, J.; Lee, H.; Lee, D.; Wilkerson, C.; Lai, K.; Mutlu, O. Flipping bits in memory without accessing them: An experimental study of DRAM disturbance errors. In Proceedings of the ACM/IEEE 41st International Symposium on Computer Architecture (ISCA), Minneapolis, MN, USA, 14–18 June 2014

Lanteigne, M. How Rowhammer Could Be Used to Exploit Weakness in Computer Hardware. 2016. Available online: https://www.thirdio.com/rowhammer.pdf (accessed on 1 April 2017).

Van der Veen, V.; Fratantonio, Y.; Lindorfer, M.; Gruss, D.; Maurice, C.; Vigna, G.; Bos, H.; Razavi, K.; Giuffrida, C. Drammer: Deterministic rowhammer attacks on mobile platforms. In Proceedings of the 2016 ACM SIGSAC Conference on Computer and Communications Security (CCS’16), Vienna, Austria, 24–28 October 2016.

Pessl, P.; Gruss, D.; Maurice, C.; Schwarz, M.; Mangard, S. DRAMA: Exploiting DRAM addressing for Cross-CPU attacks. In Proceedings of the USENIX Security Symposium, Austin, TX, USA, 10–12 August 2016.

Bosman, E.; Razavi, K.; Bos, H.; Giuffrida, C. Dedup Est Machina: Memory Deduplication as an Advanced Exploitation Vector. In Proceedings of the 2016 IEEE Symposium on Security Privacy, SP 2016, San Jose, MA, USA, 23–25 May 2016; pp. 987–1004.

Seaborn, M.; Dullien, T. Exploting the DRAM rowhammer bug to gain kernel privileges. In Proceedings of the 2016 ACM SIGSAC Conference, Vienna, Austria, 24–28 October 2016.

Qiao, R.; Seaborn, M. A new approach for rowhammer attacks. In Proceedings of the 2016 IEEE International Symposium on Hardware Oriented Security and Trust (HOST), McLean, VA, USA, 3–5 May 2016.

Aweke, Z.B.; Yitbarek, S.F.; Qiao, R.; Das, R.; Hicks, M.; Oren, Y.; Austin, T. ANVIL: Software-based protection against next-generation rowhammer attacks. In Proceedings of the 21st ACM International Conference on Architectural Support for Programming Languages and Operating Systems (ASPLOS), Atlanta, GA, USA, 2–6 April 2016

Moinuddin, K.Q.; Dae-Hyun, K.; Samira, K.; Prashant, J.N.; Onur, M. AVATAR: A variable-retention-time (vrt) aware refresh for dram systems. In Proceedings of the IEEE/IFIP International Conference on Dependable Systems and Networks (DSN), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, 22–25 June 2015

Program for Testing for the DRAM Rowhammer Problem. 2015. Available online: https://github.com/ google/rowhammer-test (accessed on 15 March 2017).

Seaborns, M. How Physical Adressesses Map to Rows and Banks in DRAM. 2015. Available online: http: //lackingrhoticity.blogspot.com/2015/05/how-physical-adresses-map-to-rows-and-banks.html (accessed on 5 April 2017).

Xiao, Y.; Zhang, X.; Teodorescu, R. One bit flips, one cloud flops: Cross-VM row hammer attacks and privilage escalation. In Proceedings of the 25th USENIX Security Symposium, Austin, TX, USA, 10–12 August 2016.

Gruss, D.; Maurice, C.; Mangard, S. Rowhammer.js: A remote software-induced fault attack in javascript. In Proceedings of the 13th Conference on Detection of Intrusions and Malware Vulnerability Assessment (DIMVA), Donostia-San Sebastián, Spain, 7–8 July 2016

Bhattacharya, S.; Mukhopadhyay, D. Curious Case of Rowhammer: Flipping Secret Exponent Bits Using Timing Analysis. Lect. Notes Comput. Sci. 2016, 9813, 602–624

Salyzyn, M. AOSP Commit 0549ddb9: UPSTREAM: Pagemap: Do Not Leak Physiscal Addresses to Non-Privilahe Userspace. 2015. Available online: http://goo.gl/Qye2MN (accessed on 1 May 2017).

Razai, K.; Gras, B.; Bosman, E.; Preneel, B.; Giuffrida, C.; Bos, H. Flip feng shui: Hammering a needle in the software stack. In Proceedings of the 25th USENIX Security Sympoisium, Austin, TX, USA, 10–12 August 2016.

Abstract views: 0
PDF Downloads: 0
Published
2021-10-30
How to Cite
Kostiuchko , S., & Olshevskyi , O. (2021). Overview of hardware vulnerabilities of embedded systems on the example of Rowhammer . COMPUTER-INTEGRATED TECHNOLOGIES: EDUCATION, SCIENCE, PRODUCTION, (44), 106-110. https://doi.org/10.36910/6775-2524-0560-2021-44-17
Section
Computer science and computer engineering